Globe and Mail rapped for Olympic cheerleading
November 19, 2009 · 14 Comments
It has been a busy and “strangely wonderful” few weeks for The Globe and Mail and its Vancouver Olympic torchbearers.
It all started last month when the newspaper published a special Olympic section that listed among the company’s torch carriers publisher Phillip Crawley, editor-in-chief John Stackhouse, and three of the paper’s columnists, Gary Mason, Roy MacGregor and Stephen Brunt.
The Globe led off its torch coverage with a first-person account by Mason on his eight minutes of glory with the flame. The headline above his Oct.30 column read: “The torch lit an Olympic spark in me.” Mason wrote, “As I started running with the torch, it felt, well, strangely wonderful. Around me were Canadians of every description: babies in strollers, teenagers in early Halloween garb, seniors draped in flags. Their cheers were deafening.”
Randy Starkman, who covers amateur sport for The Toronto Star, described the coverage as “fawning,” which was a well chosen word.
But, the fundamental issue, as Starkman pointed out in an earlier piece, wasn’t the cheerleading, but the Globe’s decision to buy so deeply into the Olympic hype as to actually have its people participate in the torch relay.
The relay is, after all, an IOC marketing initiative. And the three Globe columnists, with Stackhouse overseeing the coverage, will be in Vancouver in February, covering the Games. Just how independent and objective will they be after joining the IOC promotional machine?
Journalists are supposed to keep their distance, to be separate from the issues and events they cover, but the torch relay isn’t in any way separate from the Games. It’s part of the Olympic package.
“It’s one big promotional event that starts the drum roll toward the Olympics,” Robert Thompson, a media critic and professor of television and popular culture at Syracuse University, said this week.
“There’s a big marketing and advertising dimension to it.”
But, maybe we’re over-reacting. Perhaps the Toronto Star’s editorial board had it wrong when it rapped the Globe and also CTV for their torch relay participation, as were the Toronto Sun and several columnists. So, we asked some experts.
Thompson’s reaction to the Globe’s involvement was to call it “a little bit odd.”
“It’s kind of like a journalist who’s covering the World Series throwing out the first pitch,” he said.
He said the Globe has a small amount of wriggle room only because the torch relay can be interpreted as a sort of ritual and national event, in addition to being a marketing campaign.
“But, if I were the boss of such an operation, I would probably say, we shouldn’t do it. Cover it and talk about it, but, despite the fact it is both a ritual and an act of advertising, I would have said no.”
I asked Thompson if he could imagine the publisher and executive editor of The New York Times lacing up their runners and carrying the torch for an Olympics in the United States.
“No, I cannot picture that,” he said. “I don’t think that would happen.”
Brian Williams, CTV’s prime time Olympic host, also will carry the torch when it’s in Western Canada.
Could Thompson imagine Williams’ counterpart in the United States, Bob Costas of NBC, carrying the torch?
“My guess would be that Bob Costas wouldn’t do it,” Thompson said. “Knowing his very high standards, he wouldn’t do it.”
Paul Benedetti, a lecturer at University of Western Ontario’s journalism program and a former investigative reporter, said he was “shocked,” when he learned that Williams, who will help shape CTV’s prime time Olympic coverage, will be carrying the torch.
I emailed Tom Jolly, the sports editor of the New York Times, to ask him if he could imagine Times journalists being allowed to carry the torch.
“I don’t believe we’ve ever had anyone participate in a torch relay and I can’t imagine that we would,” he wrote. “Certainly, we’d never permit a news reporter or columnist to do so.”
Brunt’s response to the criticism was to say, Get over it, that’s the way things are in the corporate world of the Olympics and the media.
“Look, I hate to break people’s hearts and tell them there’s no Santa Clause,” he told Bob McCown of the Fan590 radio station in Toronto a few weeks ago. “But this is a commercial endeavor. The torch relay, God love it, which is going to make people tear up and is a lovely thing, and a way of including people in the Olympic process, is sponsored. And it is corporate and underwritten. And spots were sold as part of the sponsorship package. . . . This is all part of the machinery of the Olympic Games.”
According to Brunt, the pretext for the three columnists carrying the torch was to file a story about the experience, thus giving it a degree of journalistic credibility. We’ve seen Mason’s contribution, but there’s been nothing so far from Brunt and MacGregor, both of whom were in Newfoundland last weekend for their run. As for the ethical issue, Brunt said, there wasn’t one, at least as it pertained to him. But, Benedetti said it’s not good enough for a journalist to assert he’s above the ethics issue.
“What about the perception of it?” he said. “I would probably agree that it might not taint his objectivity to some extent, but what about the perception that people will have of it, and the perception with Roy MacGregor?
“Here’s a guy (Brunt) who’s a critic whether it’s on the radio or his own column, but then he’s really sort of a cheerleader for the event itself. I think it puts those guys in very difficult territory. I’m not questioning their ethics, but it puts them in a tough spot, without a doubt.”
Benedetti said the Globe’s torch relay assignments “clearly contravene the notion of maintaining a distance from those we cover. It clouds that in a way that I think is pretty difficult to disentangle.”
I’ll end with this: Many years ago, a radio reporter in Toronto made a habit of standing outside the Toronto Maple Leaf dressing room after a game and giving each player a pat on the back as he walked into the room.
Finally, the Globe’s sports columnist at the time, Allen Abel, went over to him and said, “You know, when you do that, you make us all look bad.”
The same could be said about the Globe and its involvement in the Olympic torch relay. The newspaper has embarrassed itself and the rest of us.
Milestones this week
Baseball Hall of Famer Tom Seaver turned 65; media mogul Ted Turner, 71; future Hall of Famer Ken Griffey Jr., 39; and troubadour Gordon Lightfoot celebrated his 71st on Tuesday. Lightfoot was in his home town of Orillia, Ont., a few days ago for a charity performance and is appearing this week at Toronto’s Massey Hall. This is from 1969, with Johnny Cash.



Brunt either doesn’t get it or made a mistake and is too proud to own up to it. It’s hard to imagine a journalist of his stature being ignorant of the principle that a journalist must avoid even the perception of partisanship. As a result it seems most likely that he thought he would be above reproach on an ethics charge. He was wrong about that, and this tarnishes an otherwise impressive legacy. What a shame.
Honestly, still on about this? The rest of us thought about it, and decided to continue living our lives.
Why are you saying this to a commenter and not to William Houston? It’s not the *commenters* on this blog driving the issue, dude.
I am extremely disappointed in the likes of Brunt and Brian Williams. They really should know better. Actually, I am sure that they do know better but don’t care. The credibility of both has taken a downward turn in my eyes.
As a Finnish sports journalist, and a regular reader of Truth & Rumours, this subject has been very interesting to follow.
For us, olympic torch has always been the image of Paavo Nurmi running with it to Helsinki Olympic Stadium through Marathon Gate in the opening ceremonies of 1952 Summer Games. All athletes who were already standing on the stadium field, started to run and barge to see this legend of nine olympic golds.
When talking about torch relay and is it appropriate for journalist to participate to it, we all should remember that, like Mr. Houston said, it is IOC marketing initiative and also remember when that relay was presented.
The year was 1936, when they first time lighted to torch in Olympia, Greece and went on as a relay to Berlin. It was a propaganda product of home nation of Summer Games of that year. And besides Jesse Owens, those games are remembered as a games of that one small, funny looking Austrian born corporal.
Brunt has been (and will continue to be) one of my favorite columnists/ commentators, both in print and on the radio.
That being said I was very disappointed by his participation in the Olympic marketting machine. In the past he has been very critical of the Olympics and all the goings-on around them, whether it’s cost over-runs, bold faced corruption or over-the-top boosterism by media.
His defence of this being “the world we live in now” is chilling in that it implies corporate pressure is responsible for this blurring of the line between reporting and advertising.
Hi William – I agree with your assessment on “Cheerleading” by the supposedly impartial media, however I have a quick question; CTV paid for the rights to cover the 2010 Olympics, correct? Therefore, is there not already a potential conflict in their event coverage? I’m sure it didn’t happen, but say CBC and CTV each presented the IOC with comparable offers for exclusive coverage. Could one network imply that the Olympics will get “more positive” coverage in exchange for exclusive rights? Paying for exclusive coverage (by monetary means, or otherwise) seems to place both the “winner” and the “losers” in a situation where they can “reward” or “punish” the IOC with swayed coverage based on which bid wins.
Just curious – I’m obviously not in favour of someone like Gary Mason or Brian Williams carrying the torch in lieu of an athlete or someone equally “patriotic”.
I’m worried that we won’t have any real objective Olympic journalism in this country. CTVglobemedia has wrapped themselves so tightly in the Olympic flag they’re suffocating, the Canwest papers also have some sort of official sponsorship deal, and the others (broadcast media especially) are faced with so many draconian rights restrictions as to be useless.
I just found out that CTV won’t publish my negative comment about “boycotting the Olympics” under my Skinny Dipper alias while it did publish my positive comment in the same article under my alias JWilliams.
http://skinnydips.blogspot.com/2009/11/will-this-broadcast-website-publish-my.html
shd be drum roll in the quote — not role.Like your stuff
Thanks. I need an editor.
And there’s no ‘e’ in Santa Claus… otherwise, it presents a great opinion when my initial response to the issue was ’so what?’